Difference between revisions of "Comprehension (logic)"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 18, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchJon Awbrey (talk | contribs) (copy text from [http://www.opencycle.net/ OpenCycle] of which Jon Awbrey is the sole author) |
Jon Awbrey (talk | contribs) ({{aficionados}}<sharethis /> + cats) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* [[Intension (logic)|Intension]] | * [[Intension (logic)|Intension]] | ||
* [[Intensional definition]] | * [[Intensional definition]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{aficionados}}<sharethis /> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Linguistics]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Logic]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Semiotics]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Philosopy]] |
Revision as of 11:58, 21 May 2007
In logic, the comprehension of an object is the totality of intensions, that is, attributes, characters, marks, properties, or qualities, that the object possesses, or else the totality of intensions that are pertinent to the context of a given discussion. This is the correct technical term for the whole collection of intensions of an object, but it is common in less technical usage to see intension used for both the composite and the primitive ideas.
See also
Aficionados
- See Talk:Comprehension (logic) for discussions/comments regarding this article.
- See Comprehension (logic)/Aficionados for those who have listed Comprehension (logic) as an interest.
- See Talk:Comprehension (logic)/Aficionados for discussions regarding this interest.
<sharethis />