Difference between revisions of "User talk:Centiare"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday November 23, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search (Corporate logos) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:*Human beings (whether they are business officers, celebrities, artists, or job-seekers) | :*Human beings (whether they are business officers, celebrities, artists, or job-seekers) | ||
| + | : I think the for-profit infobox_company works equally well for either public or private firms. There's only a few major sections that need data elements - public information is merely a subset within certain sections. All one needs to do for private firm is eliminate unnecessary data references within those respective sections.--[[User:Centiare|Centiare]] 14:05, 15 November 2006 (PST) | ||
And I think we need to devise '''Rules of Style''' for: | And I think we need to devise '''Rules of Style''' for: | ||
| Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
:*Occupational titles (the semantic search is really thrown off when someone might be "CEO", "Chairman", and/or "CEO and Chairman" (or, "Chairman and CEO"; or, "CEO & Chairman" with an ampersand)) | :*Occupational titles (the semantic search is really thrown off when someone might be "CEO", "Chairman", and/or "CEO and Chairman" (or, "Chairman and CEO"; or, "CEO & Chairman" with an ampersand)) | ||
| + | Without establishing early and firmly some rigid and comprehensive structures that ''work well'', we're going to be facing potentially massive re-formatting in three months' time, updating the work of many, many different visitors/owners. --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 13:41, 15 November 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Agreed. With regards to IBM, et al, this is a good example of the need for redirects. (It's also the reason why the info box has a "legal name" element as well eg Karl Nagel & Co. vs Karl Nagel & Co., LLC.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :In reference to names/titles, if they don't have their own page/article or they're not captured as a data element, then I don't see the need for consistency. That is, if foo uses CEO and bar uses Pres & CEO, who cares? | ||
| − | + | :See [[IBM]] key people as an example. Now, if titles '''were''' being captured, it would be another story. --[[User:Centiare|Centiare]] 14:05, 15 November 2006 (PST) | |
== Corporate logos == | == Corporate logos == | ||
I tried to upload the IBM corporate logo (copied from Wikipedia -- let them sort out the copyright issues), but the Centiare server said that .PNG was an invalid format. Do you have any comments about how/whether/why/what we should do about corporate logos and other images? --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 13:49, 15 November 2006 (PST) | I tried to upload the IBM corporate logo (copied from Wikipedia -- let them sort out the copyright issues), but the Centiare server said that .PNG was an invalid format. Do you have any comments about how/whether/why/what we should do about corporate logos and other images? --[[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 13:49, 15 November 2006 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 22:05, 15 November 2006
Centiare
- testing message Karl Nagel 09:40, 3 November 2006 (PST)
Income formatting in the Infobox
Karl, please take a look at this question. --MyWikiBiz 13:10, 15 November 2006 (PST)
Overall "Standards & Rules"
Karl, I have examined the site pretty carefully today, and I am seeing as a result of that the following "priority" issues that we should address as quickly as possible (before much more content is added):
We need to devise final Infobox Standards for the following entities:
- Public for-profit corporations
- Private for-profit firms (which may be satisfied above)
- Non-profit entities
- Human beings (whether they are business officers, celebrities, artists, or job-seekers)
- I think the for-profit infobox_company works equally well for either public or private firms. There's only a few major sections that need data elements - public information is merely a subset within certain sections. All one needs to do for private firm is eliminate unnecessary data references within those respective sections.--Centiare 14:05, 15 November 2006 (PST)
And I think we need to devise Rules of Style for:
- Names of human beings (am I Greg Kohs, Gregory Kohs, Gregory J. Kohs, or Gregory James Kohs?)
- Names of companies (is it International Business Machines Corporation, International Business Machines Corp., IBM Corporation, IBM Corp., or IBM?)
- Occupational titles (the semantic search is really thrown off when someone might be "CEO", "Chairman", and/or "CEO and Chairman" (or, "Chairman and CEO"; or, "CEO & Chairman" with an ampersand))
Without establishing early and firmly some rigid and comprehensive structures that work well, we're going to be facing potentially massive re-formatting in three months' time, updating the work of many, many different visitors/owners. --MyWikiBiz 13:41, 15 November 2006 (PST)
- Agreed. With regards to IBM, et al, this is a good example of the need for redirects. (It's also the reason why the info box has a "legal name" element as well eg Karl Nagel & Co. vs Karl Nagel & Co., LLC.)
- In reference to names/titles, if they don't have their own page/article or they're not captured as a data element, then I don't see the need for consistency. That is, if foo uses CEO and bar uses Pres & CEO, who cares?
- See IBM key people as an example. Now, if titles were being captured, it would be another story. --Centiare 14:05, 15 November 2006 (PST)
Corporate logos
I tried to upload the IBM corporate logo (copied from Wikipedia -- let them sort out the copyright issues), but the Centiare server said that .PNG was an invalid format. Do you have any comments about how/whether/why/what we should do about corporate logos and other images? --MyWikiBiz 13:49, 15 November 2006 (PST)
