Difference between revisions of "Comprehension (logic)"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 18, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchJon Awbrey (talk | contribs) ({{aficionados}}<sharethis /> + cats) |
Jon Awbrey (talk | contribs) (delete obsolete tags) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* [[Intension (logic)|Intension]] | * [[Intension (logic)|Intension]] | ||
* [[Intensional definition]] | * [[Intensional definition]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
[[Category:Linguistics]] | [[Category:Linguistics]] | ||
[[Category:Logic]] | [[Category:Logic]] | ||
[[Category:Semiotics]] | [[Category:Semiotics]] | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Philosophy]] |
Latest revision as of 13:38, 5 September 2017
In logic, the comprehension of an object is the totality of intensions, that is, attributes, characters, marks, properties, or qualities, that the object possesses, or else the totality of intensions that are pertinent to the context of a given discussion. This is the correct technical term for the whole collection of intensions of an object, but it is common in less technical usage to see intension used for both the composite and the primitive ideas.