Difference between revisions of "Talk:The case against Gwen Gale"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 18, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Blanked the page)
(→‎Pluton's edit: new section)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
OF COURSE WIKIPEDIA I MEAN WIKIPEDOIA IS PURE JOKESHIT, JUST OPEN MANY ACCOUNTS FROM DIF IP'S N THEY'LL ONLY FIND FEW.
  
 +
HERE R COOL LINX ON PATHETIC WIKIPEDOIA:
 +
 +
http://mywikibiz.com/User:Boxstuf/Baker_vs_Marciano_Great_External_Links !!!
 +
 +
*[http://mywikibiz.com/User:Boxstuf/wikifoos List of wikifoos, very informative info on naughty wikipedos/wikidiots from wikipedoia.cum lol!!!]
 +
 +
==HOW TO AVOID BEING BLOCKED ON WIKIPEDOIA?==
 +
: IF YOU ARE CAUGHT, SIMPLY CHANGE IP, GET IP PROXY PROGRAM, USE DIFFERENT STYLE ON ENGLISH, ESPECIALLY ON TALK PAGES, MAKE IT QUEEN'S STYLE, CHEERIO, YOURS TRULY, ETC... MOST OF ALL OPEN DOZENS OF ACCOUNTS BUT NOT ONE AFTER ANOTHER, TAKE YOUR TIME, GO UNDERGROUND!!!
 +
LOLS!!!
 +
 +
== Spam filter ==
 +
 +
If one were to try to post the address of this site as a link inside wiki, a Spam Filter would prevent it. If you tried to post it as text (txt) instead of a link, it would fly right thru.
 +
 +
== Pluton's edit ==
 +
 +
'''“We're not going to take it” (with respects to Pete Townshend)'''
 +
 +
I have made it to the mountaintop, met the messiah, and missed the morals there. Jimbo has been aware of the “Gwen Gale issue” for years, yet he continues to turn a blind eye to the problems. For instance, on 28 Jun 2010, she blocked three posts for being “(Potentially libelous/defamatory)”. If you were allowed to see the posts, they would be “(Potentially libelous/defamatory)” only to Gwen Gale. Yet she is allowed to block posts about herself. In the REAL WORLD that would be a clear conflict of interest. Not at Wikipedia, apparently.
 +
 +
What I am posting is long, a link should have done it. But anyone reading this knows how easy it is for Wiki Admins to delete, even completely disappear, anything they disagree with. So, read only what you want, you've seen the same stuff before, with other victims.
 +
 +
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Talk%3ADeath+of+Adolf+Hitler
 +
09:54, 28 June 2010 Gwen Gale (talk | contribs) changed visibility of a revision on page Talk:Death of Adolf Hitler: content hidden and edit summary hidden (Potentially libelous/defamatory)
 +
09:53, 28 June 2010 Gwen Gale (talk | contribs) changed visibility of a revision on page Talk:Death of Adolf Hitler: content hidden and edit summary hidden (Potentially libelous/defamatory)
 +
09:53, 28 June 2010 Gwen Gale (talk | contribs) changed visibility of a revision on page Talk:Death of Adolf Hitler: content hidden and edit summary hidden (Potentially libelous/defamatory)
 +
 +
'''The following came from: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wm5200&oldid=400169713'''
 +
 +
I had posted a lot of Admin abuse at article "Death of Adolf Hitler" stuff here, but just deleted it. It was overlong, and the subject is a drag. Not a fun guy. And as for her, it's the S.O.S. that you've read before. Apparently no conscience at all.

Latest revision as of 15:49, 6 December 2012

OF COURSE WIKIPEDIA I MEAN WIKIPEDOIA IS PURE JOKESHIT, JUST OPEN MANY ACCOUNTS FROM DIF IP'S N THEY'LL ONLY FIND FEW.

HERE R COOL LINX ON PATHETIC WIKIPEDOIA:

http://mywikibiz.com/User:Boxstuf/Baker_vs_Marciano_Great_External_Links !!!

HOW TO AVOID BEING BLOCKED ON WIKIPEDOIA?

IF YOU ARE CAUGHT, SIMPLY CHANGE IP, GET IP PROXY PROGRAM, USE DIFFERENT STYLE ON ENGLISH, ESPECIALLY ON TALK PAGES, MAKE IT QUEEN'S STYLE, CHEERIO, YOURS TRULY, ETC... MOST OF ALL OPEN DOZENS OF ACCOUNTS BUT NOT ONE AFTER ANOTHER, TAKE YOUR TIME, GO UNDERGROUND!!!

LOLS!!!

Spam filter

If one were to try to post the address of this site as a link inside wiki, a Spam Filter would prevent it. If you tried to post it as text (txt) instead of a link, it would fly right thru.

Pluton's edit

“We're not going to take it” (with respects to Pete Townshend)

I have made it to the mountaintop, met the messiah, and missed the morals there. Jimbo has been aware of the “Gwen Gale issue” for years, yet he continues to turn a blind eye to the problems. For instance, on 28 Jun 2010, she blocked three posts for being “(Potentially libelous/defamatory)”. If you were allowed to see the posts, they would be “(Potentially libelous/defamatory)” only to Gwen Gale. Yet she is allowed to block posts about herself. In the REAL WORLD that would be a clear conflict of interest. Not at Wikipedia, apparently.

What I am posting is long, a link should have done it. But anyone reading this knows how easy it is for Wiki Admins to delete, even completely disappear, anything they disagree with. So, read only what you want, you've seen the same stuff before, with other victims.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Talk%3ADeath+of+Adolf+Hitler 09:54, 28 June 2010 Gwen Gale (talk | contribs) changed visibility of a revision on page Talk:Death of Adolf Hitler: content hidden and edit summary hidden (Potentially libelous/defamatory) 09:53, 28 June 2010 Gwen Gale (talk | contribs) changed visibility of a revision on page Talk:Death of Adolf Hitler: content hidden and edit summary hidden (Potentially libelous/defamatory) 09:53, 28 June 2010 Gwen Gale (talk | contribs) changed visibility of a revision on page Talk:Death of Adolf Hitler: content hidden and edit summary hidden (Potentially libelous/defamatory)

The following came from: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wm5200&oldid=400169713

I had posted a lot of Admin abuse at article "Death of Adolf Hitler" stuff here, but just deleted it. It was overlong, and the subject is a drag. Not a fun guy. And as for her, it's the S.O.S. that you've read before. Apparently no conscience at all.