Difference between revisions of "Directory talk:The Wikipedia Point of View/FT2 on Animal Films"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday July 06, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search (Reply to Ockham) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::* Allow this page to be crawled by search engine spiders? (Note: it already is.) | ::* Allow this page to be crawled by search engine spiders? (Note: it already is.) | ||
::Looking forward to your response. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 05:59, 27 November 2008 (PST) | ::Looking forward to your response. -- [[User:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] 05:59, 27 November 2008 (PST) | ||
+ | ::: The first - but Wikipedia Review was what I had in mind, not really mainstream. However the link appears to have failed. I'll leave it to your judgment, Greg! Best [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 14:19, 27 November 2008 (PST) | ||
+ | ::: By the way, it is being identified by the NetSense things as porn - interesting. Are you sure it's Ok to have it on your website? [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 14:19, 27 November 2008 (PST) |
Revision as of 22:19, 27 November 2008
Google cache
I find it interesting that a Google search for the quoted phrase, "most common in equine pornography where it's easier and safer" returns only one result: the UCSC Wikipedia Trust Project. But if you follow their link, the result is a page that obviously has been oversighted by the staff of the UCSC project. Apparently, FT2 has "connections" to get this sort of under-the-rug-sweeping accomplished. That won't happen here at MyWikiBiz, short of a court-ordered notice. -- MyWikiBiz 10:25, 26 November 2008 (PST)
- Hi thanks - can we make this public? Ockham 04:54, 27 November 2008 (PST)
- By "public", you mean?
- Publicize this situation to the mainstream media?
- Convert this page to an "open" all-users-may-edit document? (Note: just copy it to Main Space.)
- Allow this page to be crawled by search engine spiders? (Note: it already is.)
- Looking forward to your response. -- MyWikiBiz 05:59, 27 November 2008 (PST)
- The first - but Wikipedia Review was what I had in mind, not really mainstream. However the link appears to have failed. I'll leave it to your judgment, Greg! Best Ockham 14:19, 27 November 2008 (PST)
- By the way, it is being identified by the NetSense things as porn - interesting. Are you sure it's Ok to have it on your website? Ockham 14:19, 27 November 2008 (PST)
- By "public", you mean?